MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031376082 · doi:10.1080/10425170601141127

Unusual organization associated to a tandem of IS<i>231</i>may yield two peculiar cloverleaf secondary structures

2007· article· en· W2031376082 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Xu, Jean‐Charles Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA sequence · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverted repeatTransposaseGeneticsORFSOpen reading frameBiologyDirect repeatTransposable elementTandem repeatInsertion sequencePlasmidEcoRINucleic acid sequencePeptide sequenceDNAGeneBase sequenceGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 5.7-kb EcoRI fragment was cloned from plasmid DNA of Bacillus thuringiensis strain M15. It contains two insertion sequences (IS), IS231M2 and -M1 in the 5'-3' order, arranged in tandem, in same orientation, separated by a 540-bp region. The primary structure is typical of a composite transposon, here of 3847 bp in length, for which the name Tn231M is proposed. Each IS is delimited by 18-bp inverted repeats (IR), and flanked by 11-bp direct repeats (DR). Both IS share 99.3% nucleotide identities. IS231M1 has a single open reading frame (ORF) which encodes a putative 477-amino-acid transposase. IS231M2 has two smaller ORFs: ORF1 and ORF2, which could code for polypeptides of 329 and 118 amino acids in length, respectively. Further analysis reveals that the regions upstream of IS231M2, and downstream of -M1, and the 540-bp region, contain additional pairs of IR and DR. Interestingly, potential annealing between all pairs of IR and DR could generate two unusual cloverleaf secondary structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA sequenceSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207