On the CDF-based scheduling for multi-cell uplink networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a cumulative distribution function (CDF)-based scheduling for multi-cell uplink networks in order to exploit multi-user diversity, while satisfying fair resource sharing among users. In the proposed scheduling, each user adjusts its transmit power to reduce the amount of generating interference to other cells, based on a pre-determined threshold. Then, each user calculates CDF of an uplink signal-to-noise ratio with the adjusted transmit power, and feeds the CDF value back to its serving base station (BS). In each time slot, the BS selects the user having the largest CDF value. The proposed scheduling operates with a distributed manner even though it effectively copes with inter-cell interference. As a main result, we prove that the proposed scheduling achieves the double-logarithmic growth of normalized user throughput which is defined as the ratio of user throughput to the probability of the user being selected. Moreover, we observe that a fixed threshold is enough to accommodate diverse network scenarios with different population sizes and user locations in the proposed scheduling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".