MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031385588 · doi:10.3123/jemsge.33.34

Introduction to Epigenetic Toxicology of Chemical Substances

2011· article· en· W2031385588 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tohru Shibuya, Yukiharu Horiya

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes and Environment · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsEpigeneticsEnvironmental toxicologyBiologySomatic cellMechanism (biology)Gene expressionXenobioticToxicologyGeneticsGeneCell biologyChemistryToxicityBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epigenetics (EG) is a highly regulated biochemical mechanism underlying the expression of genes related to development and cellular diŠerentiation that is disrupted by environmental stressors including chemicals and radiation.Studies of these phenomena are known as environmental epigenetics (EEG).Regulation of gene expression by the epigenetic mechanism is deeply involved in the developmental stages of animals and humans.EEG is, therefore, very important in the ˆeld of toxicology because it deals with the state of gene expression in all types of somatic and germ cells disrupted by environmental chemicals.We propose here an ``Embryo-originated Epigenetic Toxicology Method (EEGT)''.In this method embryonic somatic and germ cells are treated with test substances and various toxicological phenomena in whole bodies are examined.Observations on transgenerational eŠects are also important in this method.This new method could unite various toxicological phenomena based on EEG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes and EnvironmentSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207