Online Vision as a Function of Real-Time Limb Velocity: Another Case for Optimal Windows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The efficiency of online visuomotor processes was investigated by manipulating vision based on real-time upper limb velocity. Participants completed rapid reaches under two control (full vision, no vision) and three experimental visual window conditions. The experimental visual windows were early: 0.8-1.4 m/s, middle: above 1.4 m/s, and late: 1.4 to 0.8 m/s. The results indicated that endpoint consistency comparable to that of full-vision trials was observed when using vision from the early (43 ms) and middle (89 ms) windows, but vision from the middle window entailed a longer deceleration phase (i.e., a temporal cost). The late window was not useful to implement online trajectory amendments. This study provides further support for the idea of early visuomotor control, which may involve multiple online control processes during voluntary movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it