Les femmes et la politique dans les caricatures de Robert La Palme, 1943-19511
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De 1943 à 1951, Robert La Palme présente sa vision caustique de l’actualité à travers des milliers de caricatures au sein du Canada, un journal d’élite. Ses caricatures paraissent alors que les femmes investissent l’espace public et obtiennent des droits politiques au Québec. Dans son théâtre, le caricaturiste fait intervenir une panoplie d’acteurs, dont les femmes, lesquelles sont représentées sous la forme de femmes ordinaires, de personnages symboliques, et de caricatures grotesques de responsables politiques. Pour rejoindre un lectorat d’élite, soit La Palme adopte leur langage, soit il adapte le sien au leur. Aussi, le caricaturiste met-il en scène des rapports de genres conventionnels dans son oeuvre, où prime l’idéal domestique de la femme. Certains métiers, certains rôles de la femme sont ainsi valorisés, d’autres dévalorisés, voire ignorés. En fait, certains types de femmes n’apparaissent tout simplement pas dans le champ de vision du caricaturiste, comme si elles n’existaient pas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".