MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031458027 · doi:10.1080/00028487.2014.931301

Estimates of Effective Number of Breeding Adults and Reproductive Success for White Sturgeon

2014· article· en· W2031458027 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathleen Jay, James A. Crossman, Kim T. Scribner

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersBC Hydro
KeywordsSturgeonBiologyReproductive successAcipenserPopulationEndangered speciesWhite (mutation)Lake sturgeonDemographyEcologyZoologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Habitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate estimates of the number of adults contributing to offspring (Ns), effective breeding number (Nb), and individual adult contributions to recruitment are required for recovery planning for endangered White Sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus populations, many of which are suffering from prolonged periods of recruitment failure. We show that genetic techniques can be used to characterize important features of White Sturgeon reproductive ecology in large rivers where census data are extremely difficult to obtain. We used 12 microsatellite loci and likelihood‐based pedigree analysis to estimate Ns, Nb, number of kin groups (Nk), and individual reproductive success of White Sturgeon contributing to viable eggs and larvae collected in the upper Columbia River in each of 2 years. Estimated mean ±SD annual Ns was 121.5 ± 34.7, Nb was 86.5 ± 10.6, and Nk was 73.5 ± 17.3. Large variations in estimates of Ns, Nb, and Nk were observed between three spawning areas, in which one spawning site representing 61% of total adult spawning population. Variation in adult reproductive success was observed within and among sites. Estimated mean ±SD individual spawning duration was 1.9 ± 1.1 d, and number of mates per adult was 2.9 ± 2.5, which also varied spatially and temporally. Based on age of collected eggs and larvae, number of spawning days ranged from 5 to 19 d between years and among sites. Genetically derived estimates of Ns were lower but generally concordant with empirical estimates of available spawners (Nc), based on sex ratios and maturation staging of adults captured independently (Ns/Nc ratio = 0.683). Results increase our understanding of White Sturgeon reproductive ecology and recruitment and allow projections of cohort levels of genetic diversity. Similar data can be applied to recovery planning and aquaculture programs for this and other species of conservation concern. Received January 6, 2014; accepted May 28, 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207