MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031492372 · doi:10.1109/tap.2014.2308518

A Ray Launching-Neural Network Approach for Radio Wave Propagation Analysis in Complex Indoor Environments

2014· article· en· W2031492372 on OpenAlexaff
Leyre Azpilicueta, Meenakshi Rawat, Karun Rawat, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi, Francisco Falcone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGobierno de Navarra
KeywordsComputer scienceRadio propagationArtificial neural networkRadio waveRadio propagation modelWirelessRadio channelChannel (broadcasting)Computational complexity theoryAlgorithmTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel deterministic approach to model the radio wave propagation channels in complex indoor environments reducing computational complexity is proposed. This technique combines a neural network and a 3-D ray launching algorithm in order to compute wireless channel performance in indoor scenarios. An example of applying the method for studying indoor radio wave propagation is presented and the results are compared with a very high resolution fully 3-D ray launching simulation as the reference solution. The new method allows the use of a lower number of launched rays in the simulation scenario whereas intermediate points can be predicted using neural network. Therefore a high gain in terms of computational efficiency (approximately 80% saving in simulation time) is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207