MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031508994 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02319-5

Characterization of a novel human putative mitochondrial transporter homologous to the yeast mitochondrial RNA splicing proteins 3 and 4

2001· article· en· W2031508994 on OpenAlexaff
Fangyuan Li, Kaisu Nikali, Juraj Gregáň, Ingo B. Leibiger, Barbara Leibiger, Rudolf J. Schweyen, Catharina Larsson, Anu Suomalainen

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRNA splicingHSPA9Alternative splicingGeneticsGeneMitochondrial carrierTransmembrane proteinMitochondrionMitochondrial DNAExonRNAPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report here a novel human gene, hMRS3/4, encoding a putative mitochondrial transporter structurally and functionally homologous to the yeast mitochondrial RNA splicing proteins 3 and 4. These proteins belong to the family of mitochondrial carrier proteins (MCF) and are likely to function as solute carriers. hMRS3/4 spans approximately 10 kb of genomic DNA on chromosome 10q24 and consists of four exons that encode a 364-aa protein with six transmembrane domains. A putative splice variant, encoding a 177-aa protein with three transmembrane domains, was also identified. hMRS3/4 has a well-conserved signature sequence of MCF and is targeted into the mitochondria. When expressed in yeast, hMRS3/4 efficiently restores the mitochondrial functions in mrs3(o)mrs4(o) knock-out mutants. Ubiquitous expression in human tissues and a well-conserved structure and function suggest an important role for hMRS3/4 in human cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207