MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031511236 · doi:10.1159/000021007

Mid-Trimester Thoracoamniotic Shunting for the Treatment of Fetal Primary Pleural Effusions in a Twin Pregnancy

2000· article· en· W2031511236 on OpenAlexaff
Sorina Grisaru‐Granovsky, P. Gareth R. Seaward, Rory Windrim, Phil Wyatt, Edmond Kelly, Greg Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFetusAmniocentesisGestationShuntingObstetricsPregnancyHydrops fetalisPleural diseasePulmonary hypoplasiaSurgeryPrenatal diagnosisRespiratory diseaseLungInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thoracoamniotic shunting has been described as having a beneficial role in the antenatal management of primary pleural effusions in singleton pregnancies. We report a case of a twin pregnancy in which progressive pleural effusions and hydrops were diagnosed in one of the fetuses at 16 weeks of gestation. An initial evaluation ruled out underlying genetic and anatomic abnormalities in both twins. At 19 weeks gestation, the first procedure of bilateral thoracoamniotic shunting was performed in the affected fetus, subsequent to which the lungs re-expanded and the hydrops resolved. Three additional shunt replacements and one therapeutic amniocentesis were required on follow-up. At 35 weeks, labor was induced. The first fetus (healthy) was delivered vaginally and the second fetus (affected) was delivered by cesarean section. Both neonates are healthy at one year follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207