Immunohistochemical study on so‐called follicular cells and folliculostellate cells in the human adenohypophysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-hormone-secreting cells in human adenohypophysis have been designated as either follicular cells (FC) or folliculostellate cells (FSC). They have similarly long cytoplasmic processes, and the difference between FC and FSC remains unclear. An immunohistochemical study for S-100 protein, cytokeratin (CK, detected by AE1/AE3) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was performed in autopsy pituitaries. Double immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein and CK revealed that there were numerous coexpressed cells. The most frequent type ('CK-type cell') was cells weakly positive for S-100 protein in the nucleus and for CK-immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm. The next numerous type ('S-100 protein cell') was cells strongly positive for S-100 protein and weakly positive or negative for CK. The CK-type cells were frequently observed in the vicinity of follicular structures and in neighborhood of adrenocorticotropic hormone -immunoreactive cells, and were most likely the cells termed FC. They were often observed around necrotic areas. The S-100 protein cells were individually found in the circumference of endocrine cell nest, and seemed to be the so-called stellate cells. GFAP-positive cells were rare. It is implied that S-100 protein-positive FSC could be divided into at least two main subtypes: FC (CK-type cells) and stellate cells (S-100 protein cells).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it