MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031517882 · doi:10.1360/aps07075

On the terms in the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature

2007· article· en· W2031517882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li‐Bing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Phytotaxonomica Sinica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomenclatureBiologyCode (set theory)BotanyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)Programming languageComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

——————————— 2007-05-17收稿, 2007-07-02收修改稿。 * E-mail: . 国际植物命名法规中的术语介绍 1, 张丽兵 Paul C. SILVA John MCNEILL Nicholas J. TURLAND 1 (Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, Saint Louis, Missouri 63166, U.S.A.) 2 (中国科学院成都生物研究所 成都 610041) 3 (University Herbarium, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.) 4 (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, and Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, U.K.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.022
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.124

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Phytotaxonomica SinicaSame topicBotanical Studies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207