MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031526898 · doi:10.1002/zaac.200800288

Electronic Structure and Physical Properties of Hf<sub>5</sub>Sb<sub>9</sub> containing a Unique T Net of Sb Atoms

2008· article· en· W2031526898 on OpenAlexaff
Jianxiao Xu, Katja M. Kleinke, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimonideAntimonyAtom (system on chip)Net (polyhedron)CrystallographyMaterials scienceElectronic structureChemistryComputational chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hf5Sb9 was the first and thus far only example of an inorganic material that contains a pure T net, i.e. a planar layer of three‐bonded Sb atoms. It crystallizes in a super structure of the ZrSiS type, wherein the originally square layers are diluted and deformed to form said T net. Each Sb atom of this net, labeled Sb3, is connected to three symmetry equivalent Sb atoms at distances of about 3Å, reminiscent of molecular T examples such as BrF3. According to electronic structure calculations, these three Sb3–Sb3 interactions correspond to medium strong bonds. Hf5Sb9 is a high‐temperature antimonide that decomposes slowly under formation of HfSb2 at intermediate temperatures such as 750 °C, while it can be stored literally for years at room temperature. Like all other studied binary hafnium antimonides, Hf5Sb9 is metallic with a small Seebeck coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine ChemieSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207