MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031530957 · doi:10.1179/crn.2004.039

Focal Osteoporotic Marrow Defect: Report of 100 New Cases with Ultrasonography Scans

2004· article· en· W2031530957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCRANIO® · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathologicalRadiologyBone marrowRadiographyBiopsyEtiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal osteoporotic marrow defect (FOMD) may be the earliest detectable form of the ischemic marrow disorders. The exact cause is unknown, but three theories have been proposed in the literature. A fourth is presented in this paper. In this study, 100 biopsies were examined histologically and were diagnosed as FOMD, based upon consistent histological characteristics. Until recently, the only diagnostic criteria were radiographic evaluation and incisional biopsy. In February 2002, a through-transmission alveolar ultrasonic test (Cavitat 4000, Cavitat Medical Technologies, Inc., Aurora, CO) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and by Health Canada for detection of low bone density and bone desiccation, both features of FOMD and chronic ischemic bone disease. Within this article, the diagnostic criteria and pathological findings of FOMD will be presented. The three current theories concerning its etiology will be briefly presented and a fourth theory will be proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it