MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031535907 · doi:10.1109/mobilecloud.2014.24

Mobile-Based Medical Data Accessibility in mHealth

2014· article· en· W2031535907 on OpenAlexaff
Richard K. Lomotey, Ralph Deters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencemHealthMobile computingMobile deviceMobile technologyMiddleware (distributed applications)Mobile cloud computingInformation privacyMobile WebData accessCloud computingComputer securityInternet privacyHealth careWorld Wide WebComputer networkDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The medical domain is embracing mobile technology (mHealth) to enable healthcare professionals have ubiquitous access to the Electronic Health Records (EHR). This creates the need for supporting mobile users to access medical data remotely in real-time, especially in mission critical and decision making situations. However, supporting real-time access and services synchronization in highly distributed mobile environments can be challenging due to the presence of the following factors: 1) sporadic wireless disconnections, 2) fluctuating bandwidth, 3) variations in device features, and 4) battery life constraints. The mobility of the healthcare professionals also poses threats to privacy especially when personalized devices such as smartphones get into the wrong hands. In this work, we focus on the above highlighted challenges by proposing a middleware-oriented mobile cloud computing framework that facilitates near real-time data propagation in the mobile environment. Also, we explore privacy and security options for the accessibility of the medical data in a mobile environment based on provenance and data transformation. The privacy is enhanced through the implementation of policies which ensures that the requester of the medical record is the intended user. The evaluation of the system, called Med App, shows that medical data dissemination can be achieved efficiently and securely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207