MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031562570 · doi:10.7202/045836ar

Cinquante ans de recherches et de débats.

2011· article· fr· W2031562570 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean‐Philippe Warren, Yves Gingras

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après un rappel historique des principales motivations ayant présidé à la création de Recherches sociographiques, nous présentons les résultats d’une analyse quantitative des thématiques et des références des articles, des institutions et des disciplines d’appartenance des auteurs et ce, afin d’identifier les tendances de la recherche véhiculées par la revue depuis sa fondation en 1960. L’évolution du contenu de la revue montre bien que la sociographie québécoise, de par l’évolution de ses objets, a suivi de près les transformations sociales du Québec mais aussi celles de la discipline en général.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.507
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.047 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeFrench-language works237,207