MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031573282 · doi:10.15273/dmj.vol34no3.3967

Women in Medicine Night

2007· article· en· W2031573282 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexandra Mortimer, Melissa Persaud

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie Medical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

students and faculty of Dalhousie University held the medical school's first "Women in Medicine" night.With the new class of 2010 being composed of greater than 50% females, students were interested in learning how practicing female physicians felt about being women in medicine.The objective of the event was to create an informal evening during which students could have the opportunity to hear from, and ask questions of, practicing physicians in various areas of medicine about what it is like to be a female in the medical community.The main goals of the evening itself were to foster the building of connections between these physicians and the students and for students to attain advice about balancing both their lifestyle and career.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie Medical JournalSame topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207