Controlling the dose distribution with gEUD-type constraints within the convex radiotherapy optimization framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an important modality in treating various cancers. Various treatment planning and delivery technologies have emerged to support intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), creating significant opportunities to advance this type of treatment. However, one of the fundamental questions in treatment planning and optimization, 'can we produce better treatment plans relying on the existing delivery technology?' still remains unanswered, in large part due to the underlying computational complexity of the problem, which, in turn, often stems from the optimization model being non-convex. We investigate the possibility of including the dose prescription, specified by the dose-volume histogram (DVH), within the convex optimization framework for inverse radiotherapy treatment planning. Specifically, we study the quality of approximating a given DVH with a superset of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)-based constraints, the so-called generalized moment constraints (GMCs). As a bi-product, we establish an analytic relationship between a DVH and a sequence of gEUD values. The newly proposed approach is promising as demonstrated by the computational study where the rectum DVH is considered. Unlike the precise partial-volume constraints formulation, which is commonly based on the mixed-integer model and necessitates the use of expensive computing resources to be solved to global optimality, our convex optimization approach is expected to be feasible for implementation on a conventional treatment planning station.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".