MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2031592680 · doi:10.2118/108351-ms

Environmentally Sensitive Well Successfully Drills Underbalanced Using Recycling Technology

2007· article· en· W2031592680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Schmigel, Scott Code

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingPetroleum engineeringSour gasDrillingUnderbalanced drillingEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringNatural gasDrilling fluidMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In 2005 a sour underbalanced horizontal gas well was designed and drilled in a pristine, environmentally sensitive region of southern Alberta, Canada. There were two primary drivers for the client. One was to remain under reservoir pressure throughout drilling and completion operations and the second driver was to safely recover 9.0% hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas production and recycle the H2S contaminated drilling fluid. The well was not classified as critical sour because of its proximity to populated areas and a low well productivity of 0.015 E3m3/kPa (0.37 Mscf/psi); however, a cumulative flaring limit of 240 E3m3 (8.5 MMscf) was imposed by Alberta’s Energy and Utility Board (EUB). Casing and hole sizes were optimized after confirming the well could be successfully drilled underbalanced to total depth (TD). Both well engineering and process engineering were integrated to provide the process and equipment to accommodate the sour well effluent while controlling the downhole multiphase flow and pressure environment. The injection gas for the underbalanced section was supplied via on-site compression from a sales quality gas supply line at a rate of up to 55 sm3/min (1,950 scf/m) at 10 000 kPa (1,450 psi). National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) certified equipment was employed to create an enclosed gas and liquids separation system. The sour return gas was recompressed down an existing pipeline to a gathering station approximately 10 km (6.2 miles). To ensure the safety of the rig floor personnel, the drillstring was purged with an inert gas to the top float, and then bled off back to a low pressure separation system for drillstring connections. The well was successfully drilled underbalanced for 21 days, with 1.3% (8.5 E3M3)(0.3 MMscf) of the cummulative gas being flared. The use of recycled and recovered natural gas has economic benefits when compared to conventional disposable inert gas supplies, especially on a project basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→