MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031597091 · doi:10.1504/ijvd.2010.033830

Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation of cam profile for a new cam drive engine

2010· article· en· W2031597091 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Vehicle Design · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)EngineeringEvolutionary algorithmMechanism (biology)Representation (politics)Construct (python library)Automotive engineeringControl engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an essential research effort in developing a new cam drive engine, this study investigates a complex multi-objective cam shape optimisation problem for a unique cam mechanism in the cam drive engine. A uniform B-spline representation is developed to construct the cam shape. Moreover, an evolutionary multi-objective optimisation approach is applied to solve the problem. The optimisation results show that the overall engine performance is improved significantly by the evolutionary multi-objective optimisation approach compared to the initial design. In the meantime, the ease and flexibility of the optimisation approach in solving this complex cam shape optimisation problem are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it