MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031614523 · doi:10.1108/13552511311315968

Risk based integrity modeling of offshore process components suffering stochastic degradation

2013· article· en· W2031614523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability engineeringComponent (thermodynamics)Process (computing)Degradation (telecommunications)Gamma processComputer scienceSubmarine pipelineBayesian probabilityStochastic processEngineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a risk‐based integrity model for the optimal replacement of offshore process components, based on the likelihood and consequence of failure arising from time‐dependent degradation mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach Risk is a combination of the probability of failure and its likely consequences. Offshore process component degradation mechanisms are modeled using Bayesian prior‐posterior analysis. The failure consequences are developed in terms of the cost incurred as a result of failure, inspection and maintenance. By combining the cumulative posterior probability of failure and the equivalent cost of degradations, the operational life‐risk curve is produced. The optimal replacement strategy is obtained as the global minimum of the operational risk curve. Findings The offshore process component degradation mechanisms are random processes. The proposed risk‐based integrity model can be used to model these processes effectively to obtain an optimal replacement strategy. Bayesian analysis can be used to model the uncertainty in the degradation data. The Bayesian posterior estimation using an M‐H algorithm converged to satisfactory results using 10,000 simulations. The computed operational risk curve is observed to be a convex function of the service life. Furthermore, it is observed that the application of this model will reduce the risk of operation close to an ALARP level and consequently will promote the safety of operation. Research limitations/implications The developed model is applicable to offshore process components which suffer time‐dependent stochastic degradation mechanisms. Furthermore, this model is developed based on an assumption that the component degradation processes are independent. In reality, the degradation processes may not be independent. Practical implications The developed methodology and models will assist asset integrity engineers/managers in estimating optimal replacement intervals for offshore process components. This can reduce operating costs and resources required for inspection and maintenance (IM) tasks. Originality/value The frequent replacement of offshore process components involves higher cost and risk. Similarly, the late replacement of components may result in failure and costly breakdown maintenance. The developed model estimates an optimal replacement strategy for offshore process components suffering stochastic degradation. Implementation of the developed model improves component integrity, increases safety, reduces potential shutdown and reduces operational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it