L'habitant canadien dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle : survie ou survivance?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'étude du monde rural québécois pendant la première moitié du XIXe siècle se heurte à de nombreux obstacles, notamment l'absence d'outils cartographiques de base illustrant la géographie concrète des campagnes et la difficulté à discerner l'habitant de la population rurale non agricole. Aux images classiques d'une société entièrement vouée à l'agriculture et vivant repliée sur elle-même, des études détaillées du territoire seigneurial permettent d'opposer celle d'un monde beaucoup diversifié, marqué par la croissance villageoise et par la montée d'une économie de marché, que sanctionne un foisonnement sans précédent d'industries rurales. À côté des aires où l'économie de marché ne permet que la consolidation des genres de vie traditionnels, il s'en profile d'autres, où émergent de véritables îlots de modernité. Jusqu'aux années 1850, le Québec semble se comporter comme les autres pays développés de l'économie-monde nord-atlantique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".