MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031646990 · doi:10.1097/mph.0b013e3181fe68e0

Diffuse Intrinsic Brainstem Tumor in an Infant

2011· article· en· W2031646990 on OpenAlexaff
Andréa Maria Cappellano, Éric Bouffet, Sérgio Cavalheiro, Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves, Nasjla Saba da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVinorelbineBrainstemVinca alkaloidAstrocytomaChemotherapyNatural historyPathologyGliomaOncologyInternal medicineVincristineCisplatinCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brainstem gliomas constitute 10% to 20% of all pediatric tumors of the central nervous system, and diffusely infiltrative brainstem gliomas are the most common brainstem tumors associated with a poor prognosis. A small subset of these tumors is benign, showing low-grade features on histology. The role of chemotherapy in the management of these tumors is ill defined, especially in the neonates. There are anecdotal reports of spontaneous remission, but the natural history of these tumors does not support a wait-and-see approach. Thus, we report a successful experience of chemotherapy in a 4-month-old girl with a diffuse brainstem fibrillary astrocytoma, treated with vinorelbine (30 mg/m/d on days 0, 8, and 22), a vinca alkaloid that has shown activity against glioma. Our experience suggests that vinorelbine may be effective in pediatric low-grade gliomas as this patient showed significant clinical improvement over a short period of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207