MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2031666275 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-810

Abstract 810: Integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis in idenfitication of biomarkers of chemoresistance in serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

2013· article· en· W2031666275 on OpenAlexaff
Madhuri Koti, R. J. Gooding, Paulo Nuin, Alexandria Haslehurst, Colleen Crane, Johanne I. Weberpals, Timothy Childs, Peter Bryson, Moyez Dharsee, Kenneth Evans, Harriet Feilotter, Paul C. Park, Jeremy A. Squire

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCancer Care OntarioOttawa HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian cancerSerous fluidGene expression profilingChemotherapyMicroarrayOncologyMicroarray analysis techniquesCancer researchBiologyCopy-number variationTranscriptomeInternal medicineMedicineCancerGeneGene expressionGeneticsGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy remains a major impediment in the treatment of serous epithelial ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to use gene expression and copy number profiling to delineate major deregulated pathways and biomarker networks associated with the development of intrinsic chemotherapy resistance with exposure to standard first-line therapy for ovarian cancer. The study cohort comprised 28 high grade serous ovarian cancer patients divided into two groups based on their varying sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy using progression free survival (PFS) as a surrogate of response. Twelve patient tumors demonstrating relative resistance to platinum based chemotherapy corresponding to shorter PFS (less than 6 months) were compared to 16 tumors from platinum-sensitive patients (PFS more than 18months). Molecular profiling was performed using Affymetrix high-resolution microarray platforms to permit global comparisons of gene expression levels and copy number profiles between tumors from the resistant group with the sensitive group. Microarray data analysis revealed a set of 227 discriminating genes of which expression levels may be influencing differential chemotherapy response between the two groups. Pathway analysis of these genes showed the,PI3K,NFkB and IGF1 networks as some of the significant networks distinguishing the chemotherapy resistant with the sensitive group. Copy number analysis performed using Nexus copy number version 6.1 revealed differences in the chromosomal regions, 4q31.22, 5q13.2, 9p24.3, 2p23.2, 16q21, 6q14.1, 7p22.3, 12p13 and Xq. Integrative copy number and gene expression profiling will delineate the drivers of chemotherapy resistance in patients undergoing standard platinum-based treatment of ovarian cancer. Future studies to validate these markers are necessary to apply this knowledge to biomarker-based clinical trials. Citation Format: Madhuri Koti, Robert J. Gooding, Paulo Nuin, Alexandria Haslehurst, Colleen Crane, Johanne Weberpals, Timothy Childs, Peter Bryson, Moyez Dharsee, Kenneth Evans, Harriet E. Feilotter, Paul C. Park, Jeremy A. Squire. Integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis in idenfitication of biomarkers of chemoresistance in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 810. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-810

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→