Examination of dialysis patients by a systematic review focused on serum phosphorus value
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In November 2006, The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) announced its first guideline, "The guideline for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic dialysis patients," which gives the recommended range of management target values, especially for serum phosphorus, corrected serum calcium and serum intact parathyroid hormone concentrations. Recent studies have suggested that these factors are independently associated with mortality, especially increased cardiovascular mortality. In this research we focused on the serum phosphorus concentration because it is the highest clinical factor among these three. We systematically reviewed almost all documents that discussed the relation between serum phosphorus concentration and mortality as well as the "range of the management target value" specified by foreign guidelines from the US, UK, Canada, Australia and other countries. We summarized the finding concerning the serum phosphorus value of dialysis patients (especially the upper bound value). As a result, it was found that the "range of the management target value" varied among these guidelines. The reasons for this variation likely included differences in the measurement day, in the categories of serum phosphorus concentration, and in the exposure conditions among the studies to which the guidelines referred. Moreover, it was concluded that the Japanese guideline announced by the JSDT should be updated based on the results of future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".