MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effects of Prolonged Exercise with and without a Thermal Clamp on Extracellular Hsp72 Concentration

2006· article· en· W2031697211 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Whitham, Stewart J. Laing, Anna Jackson, Neil P. Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperthermiaAnalysis of varianceCore temperatureThermoregulationExtracellularMedicineRectal temperatureRepeated measures designAnimal sciencePost-hoc analysisHeat stressClampPost hocInternal medicineExercise intensityEndurance trainingChemistryEndocrinologyHeart rateBiologyBiochemistryBlood pressureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat shock protein 72 (Hsp72) is released into the circulation during exercise and is proposed to constitute part of the stress response, with possible roles in the modulation of innate immunity (Fleshner, M and Johnson, J.D (2005) Int. J. Hyperthermia 21: 457–471). Whilst other exercise related stressors (in addition to heat) appear capable of inducing intracellular Hsp72, it is unclear as to the stimulus of Hsp72 release during exercise, since exercise is often accompanied by a rise in core temperature. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of prolonged exercise with and without a thermal clamp on extracellular Hsp72 (eHsp72) concentration. METHODS: Eleven healthy male volunteers (mean ± SEM: age; 21 ± 1 yrs, height; 180 ±2 cm, mass; 75.7 ±2.1 kg, VO2max 57.8 ± 1 ml.kg−1. min−1) completed three 2 h water immersion trials (immersed to shoulder level) in a random order and separated by 7 d. Trials were thermoneutral exercise (TE: water temperature 36°C) cold exercise (CE: 24°C), and hot seated (HS: 39°C). Exercise trials (TE and CE) comprised deep water running at 58.4 ±0.7 and 59.2 ±0.5 % VO2max. EDTAblood samples were collected at pre, post and 1 h post immersion. eHsp72 concentrations were determined using ELISA (Stressgen, Canada). Data were analyzed using a trial by time repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's HSD and Bonferroni comparisons where appropriate. RESULTS: Rectal temperature was successfully clamped on the CE trial (−0.01°C) and rose by 2.23°C on the TE trial and 2.31°C on the HS trial. All trials induced an eHsp72 response (TE p<0.01, CE and HS p<0.05 vs. pre-immersion). The immediately post immersion eHsp72 concentration was highest in the TE trial and was significantly greater than HS (TE 6.52 +1.1 ng/ml; HS 2.99 + 0.67 ng/ml p<0.05). Although eHsp72 concentration immediately post immersion was higher in TE versus CE (CE 3.85 + 0.78 ng/ml), this did not reach significance (p>0.05). eHsp72 concentrations remained elevated 1h after immersion in all trials (p<0.05) with no inter-trial differences observed. CONCLUSION: Given that exercising with a thermal clamp evoked similar increases in plasma eHsp72 concentration to passive heat stress, exercise related stressors other than heat may also be involved in the extracellular Hsp72 response to exercise. Furthermore, these effects appear to be additive during exercise accompanied by a rise in core temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207