MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031722973 · doi:10.1112/plms/83.2.299

Solubility of Certain Pencils of Curves of Genus 1, and of the Intersection of two Quadrics in P<sup>4</sup>

2001· article· en· W2031722973 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas O. Bender, Peter Swinnerton‐Dyer

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsElliptic curveGenusPencil (optics)Intersection (aeronautics)Pure mathematicsDegree (music)Section (typography)CombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main part of the paper finds necessary conditions for solubility of a pencil of curves of genus 1, each of which is a 2-covering of an elliptic curve with at least one 2-division point. As in previous work, these are proved subject to Schinzel's Hypothesis and to the finiteness of the Tate-Šafarevič group of elliptic curves defined over a number field. It thus generalizes earlier work of Colliot-Thélène, Skorobogatov and the second author. The final section gives necessary conditions (though of a rather ugly nature) for the solubility of a Del Pezzo surface of degree 4. 2000 Mathematical Subject Classification: 11D25.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207