MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thalidomide for the treatment of hemangiosarcoma in dogs

2004· article· en· W2031792534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary and Comparative Oncology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemangiosarcomaThalidomideMedicineAngiosarcomaChemotherapyValproic AcidSurgeryInternal medicinePathologyMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemangiosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm of vascular endothelium occurring most frequently in older large breed dogs. Noncutaneous hemangiosarcoma is highly metastatic (>80% at diagnosis). Surgery is the primary method of treatment; however, even with adjuvant chemotherapy the prognosis for long‐term survival is low. Hence, new therapies are needed. The sedative‐hypnotic drug thalidomide (alpha‐N‐phthalimidoglutarimide) was withdrawn from general distribution in the 1960's after recognition of its teratogenicity and association with phocomelia. Recently, discredited thalidomide is making a comeback for its immunomodulatory and antiangiogenesis properties to treat inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic diseases in people. Thalidomide can inhibit the proliferation of blood vessels associated with tumour development, thereby stopping or slowing tumour growth (similar to the devastating effect of the in utero interference with the blood supply of the developing limbs of the fetus). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to retrospectively obtain the results of thalidomide therapy for canine hemangiosarcoma. A prospective study for the use of thalidomide therapy for the treatment of canine hemangiosarcoma was also planned. Materials and Methods: Fourteen dogs with histologically diagnosed hemangiosarcoma were retrospectively entered into the study. Dogs were treated at 100–400 mg per day. Unfortunately, a legal, consistent source of thalidomide for treatment of dogs could not be obtained; therefore, the prospective study was postponed. Results: The median survival was 61 days with a range of 0 days to 2 years. Conclusions: Only limited efficacy data are available so far to define the clinical utility of thalidomide in canine hemangiosarcoma. However, in this pilot study there were prolonged responses to thalidomide in some patients which prompts a phase 2 investigation of thalidomide in canine hemangiosarcoma. The optimal dose and schedule of administration in dogs remains to be determined but the absence of myelosuppressive and other important adverse effects suggests thalidomide could be used in combination with chemotherapy. We conclude that thalidomide (or its analogues) could open the possibility for novel treatment that targets tumours and their microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it