MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031801696 · doi:10.1109/cicc.2013.6658551

A 5GS/s 4-bit time-based single-channel CMOS ADC for radio astronomy

2013· article· en· W2031801696 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew R. Macpherson, J.W. Haslett, Leonid Belostotski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsEffective number of bitsSpurious-free dynamic rangeCMOSSuccessive approximation ADCAnalog-to-digital converterFigure of meritElectronic engineeringPhysics12-bitElectrical engineeringSampling (signal processing)VoltageEngineeringCapacitorOptoelectronicsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 4-bit 65nm time-based analog-to-digital converter (ADC) targeting the next-generation Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is presented. This ADC is composed of an analog voltage-to-time converter (VTC) front end and a digital time-to-digital converter (TDC) back end. The two components can be physically separated to minimize the impact of digital noise from the ADC on high-gain, high-sensitivity receiver chains common in radio telescopes. At a sampling rate of 5 GS/s the ADC consumes 35 mW from a 1 V supply. After calibration, the ADC achieves a peak SNDR of 22.9 dB, SFDR of 34.0 dB and ENOB of 3.5. At the ERBW of 2100 MHz, SNDR is 18.4 dB, SFDR is 22.3 dB and ENOB is 2.8. The resulting worst-case figure of merit is 1.0 pJ/conversion. This is the highest reported sampling rate for a time-based ADC to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207