Kinetic modelling of oxygen dependence in oxidative dehydrogenation of propane
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several Mars—Van Krevelen‐type redox kinetic models were developed for the catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of propane and examined for their ability to predict high propene yields at low oxygen/propane feed ratios. The intent in this study was to use modelling as a means of extracting further mechanistic insight from experimental data rather than to identify the best model. Thus, a conventional redox model with a consecutive reaction mechanism and a single pathway for the production of carbon oxides predicts higher propene selectivity but only at the expense of low propane conversion. Experimental data indicated, however, that even at the same propane conversion, propene selectivity increased as the oxygen partial pressure was lowered. Models that successfully describe the data had an additional carbon oxide production path involving the reaction of propane with deeply oxidizing surface oxygen species. Kinetic models and experimental data examined do not fully resolve how these deeply oxidizing surface oxygen species are formed. However, they do reflect the accepted view that lattice oxygen selectively produces propene whereas more weakly bound surface adsorbed oxygen reacts to completely oxidize propane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it