MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031823834 · doi:10.1063/1.3082372

Liouvillian quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstrom black holes

2009· article· en· W2031823834 on OpenAlexaff
W. E. Couch, C. L. Holder

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChandrasekhar limitQuasinormal modePhysicsCountable setBlack hole (networking)Mathematical physicsCharge (physics)Normal modeInfinityClassical mechanicsMathematicsMathematical analysisGravitationQuantum mechanicsPure mathematicsWhite dwarfStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We identify a countable infinity of new exact, closed-form, quasinormal mode perturbations of Reissner–Nordstrom black holes. We obtain a finite number of these modes explicitly, together with the values of the quasinormal frequency and the black hole charge for which the modes are valid. These modes are contained in the Liouvillian perturbations obtained from the application of Kovacic’s well-known algorithm to Chandrasekhar’s radial equations. Our results suggest that the set of quasinormal modes found in this paper, plus the known algebraically special perturbations, are the only Liouvillian quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstrom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207