MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031828616 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00671.2004

Effects of pre-, peri-, and postmyocardial infarction treatment with losartan in rats: effect of dose on survival, ventricular arrhythmias, function, and remodeling

2004· article· en· W2031828616 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ali Pourdjabbar, Thomas G. Parker, Quang T. Nguyen, Jean‐François Desjardins, Nathalie Lapointe, James N. Tsoporis, Jean‐Lucien Rouleau

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMerck CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsLosartanVentricular remodelingCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineInfarctionMyocardial infarctionAngiotensin IIReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and improve LV function and survival when started postmyocardial infarction (MI). ARBs also reduce ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia-reperfusion injury when started pre-MI. No information exists regarding their efficacy and safety when started pre-MI and continued peri- and post-MI. We evaluated whether the ARB losartan improves the outcome when started pre-MI and continued peri- and post-MI. Male Wistar rats (n = 502) were treated for 7 days pre-MI with losartan at a high dose (30 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)), progressively increasing dose (3 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) increased to 10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) 10 days and 30 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) 20 days post-MI), or no treatment. Ambulatory systolic blood pressure and Holter monitoring were performed for 24 h post-MI. Echocardiography was done 30 days post-MI, and LV remodeling, cardiac hemodynamics, and fetal gene expression were assessed 38 days post-MI. High-dose losartan reduced 24-h post-MI survival compared with the progressive dose and control (21.9% vs. 36.6% and 38.1%, P = 0.033 and P = 0.009, respectively). This was associated with greater hypotension in the high dose and no change in ventricular arrhythmias in all groups. In 24-h post-MI survivors, the progressive dose group had reduced mortality from 24 h to 38 days (8.5% vs. 28.6% for control vs. 38.9% for high dose, P = 0.032 and P = 0.01, respectively). Survivors of both losartan groups demonstrated improved LV remodeling, cardiac hemodynamics, preserved GLUT-4, and reduced cardiac fetal gene expression. Pretreatment with ARBs does not reduce 24-h post-MI ventricular arrhythmias or survival, and high doses increase mortality by causing excessive hypotension. In 24-h post-MI survivors, progressively increasing doses of losartan have multiple beneficial effects, including improved survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207