MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031843916 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v5n4p107

A NBEM for the Time-Dependent Anisotropic Problem in an Exterior Elliptic Domain

2013· article· en· W2031843916 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qing Chen, Dan Feng, Baoqing Liu, Qikui Du

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical analysisDomain (mathematical analysis)Elliptic curveAnisotropyBoundary element methodBoundary value problemBoundary (topology)Free boundary problemFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the natural boundary element method~(NBEM) for an anisotropic hyperbolic problem in an exterior elliptic domain is investigated. By the theory of the natural boundary reduction~(NBR), the natural integral equation~(NIE) and the Poisson integral formula of the problem considered are obtained, and the numerical method of the NIE is given. Finally, some numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the performance of the method in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207