Importance of complement 3 and mannose receptors in phagocytosis of<i>Paracoccidioides brasiliensis</i>conidia by<i>Nramp1</i>congenic macrophages lines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic factors influence susceptibility to Paracoccidioidomycosis, a Latin American endemic mycosis. The pattern of susceptibility of congenic mouse strains infected with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis resembles the pattern of the Nramp1 gene. Thus, congenic murine bone-marrow-derived macrophage lines B10R (Nramp1rGly169) and B10S (null Nramp1 protein expression, Nramp1sAsp169) were infected with P. brasiliensis conidia and compared, under opsonic and nonopsonic conditions. Opsonization increased the percentage of phagocytosis by both cell lines. B10R macrophages exhibited a higher percentage of cells with associated conidia and higher number of conidia per macrophage than B10S. Heat-inactivation and EDTA treatment of serum used for opsonization, and treatment of macrophages with anti-complement receptor 3 (CR3) decreased phagocytosis by both cell lines. alpha-methyl-d-mannoside reduced phagocytosis by B10R macrophages, suggesting that the mannose receptor participates in phagocytosis by these cells. The CR3 expression was similar on both cell lines and B10R expressed more mannose receptors, but neither cell line expressed CR1. IFNgamma decreased the conversion of conidia to the yeast form of P. brasiliensis in B10R, but not in B10S macrophages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it