MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031870137 · doi:10.7202/1024743ar

Bien plus que de la musique ! Le punk rock comme force de participation sociale et politique

2014· article· fr· W2031870137 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fabien Hein

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunkHumanitiesArtPolitical scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le DIY ( Do It Yourself ) constitue le régime d’engagement majeur de la scène punk rock. Il en est « l’arrière-scène ». Ce régime, fondé sur la célébration de l’action ne revêt pas seulement une dimension artistique et culturelle. Il recouvre également une dimension sociale et politique animée par un puissant désir de corriger certains déséquilibres sociaux en participant concrètement à la vie de la cité. De ce fait, contrairement aux idées reçues, le régime d’engagement punk rock s’avère objectivement structurant. Cet article entend en mesurer les effets à la lumière de plusieurs exemples d’expériences participatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.023
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207