Numerical Modeling of Slender Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Shaking Table Tests Under High-Frequency Ground Motions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the numerical modeling of large-scale shake table tests of slender 8-story reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall specimens. Nonlinear time history analyses are carried out using reinforced concrete fiber elements (OpenSees, OS) and the finite element (FE) methods (VecTor2, VT2). The effects of the modeling assumptions are investigated, including: (a) the tension stiffening effect, (b) damping, (c) smeared vs. lumped reinforcement, and (d) the use of effective shear stiffness in OS. Good agreements are obtained between the numerical and experimental results. Using the proposed numerical modeling strategy, it is possible to investigate the nonlinear dynamic responses of slender RC wall structures with confidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it