Relaxation during polymerization on slow heating and the vibrational heat capacity of the polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The real and imaginary components of the complex heat capacity, C(p) (') and C(p) ("), and C(p,app) have been measured in real time during the linear chain polymerization on 12 K/h heating of six different (partially) polymerized states of a stoichiometric mixture of cyclohexylamine and diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A. Their C(p,app) shows a sigmoid shape rise with different onset temperatures T(onset), which is followed by a deep exotherm as the viscosity decreases and further polymerization occurs at different rates. The rates of their enthalpy decrease on polymerization determined by subtracting C(p) (') from C(p,app) differ but C(p) (') and C(p,app) of their final states are the same. The relaxation time increases with polymerization and decreases with an increase in T. C(p) (') rises in a sigmoid shape manner, and C(p) (") shows a peak when the relaxation time of the polymerized state is equal to the inverse of the temperature modulation frequency, whether polymerization occurs or not. The unrelaxed or vibrational heat capacity C(p,vib) of the polymers at T>T(onset) is close to C(p) of their glassy state at T<T(onset), showing that C(p) difference between the equilibrium liquid and its glass is mostly configurational. This contradicts a calculation showing that C(p,vib) change of a polymer at T(g) is generally approximately 20% of the total C(p) change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".