MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031987139 · doi:10.1139/z00-169

Stable carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotope ratios in riparian food webs on rivers receiving sewage and pulp-mill effluents

2001· article· en· W2031987139 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mark Wayland, Keith A. Hobson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsEffluentδ15NRiparian zonePulp millSewageEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryPaper millNutrientIsotopes of nitrogenSewage treatmentNitrogenEcologyBiologyδ13CStable isotope ratioChemistryEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined spatial trends in ratios of stable isotopes of nitrogen (δ 15 N), carbon (δ 13 C), and sulfur (δ 34 S) in riparian food webs leading to a riparian, insectivorous bird species, the tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), on rivers receiving pulp-mill effluent and municipal sewage and compared them with ratios of these isotopes in components of the effluents themselves. The study was conducted on two rivers in western Canada at sites upstream and downstream from sewage and pulp mill effluent sources. Municipal sewage contained materials with δ 15 N or δ 13 C values that were distinct from background conditions in the receiving environment. Pulp-mill effluent contained materials with δ 34 S values that were distinct from those at upstream sites on the rivers. At both locations, effluent-derived nitrogen and sulfur were observed in algae and suspended sediments at sites downstream from the effluent sources. This was also observed in adult aquatic insects, the one exception being that uptake of effluent-derived nitrogen was detected isotopically at only one location. Tree swallows' use of sewage-derived nitrogen was evident only at one location, while use of pulp-mill-derived sulfur was evident only at the other location. Our study demonstrates the usefulness and limitations of measuring stable isotopes for tracing the movement of nutrients derived from sewage and pulp-mill effluent in freshwater ecosystems and, further, indicates that such tracing may be extended to riparian species feeding on aquatic prey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207