MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031999849 · doi:10.7202/041457ar

Dramaturgie et analyse dramaturgique

2010· article· fr· W2031999849 on OpenAlex
Bernard Martin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHistory, Culture, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article propose : 1) une étude de l’évolution sémantique (et historique) du concept de dramaturgie, du concepteur originel de l’oeuvre dramatique (le dramatourgos ) à celui qui en entreprend désormais l’étude en vue de son passage à la scène (der Dramaturg ); 2) un examen de la notion contemporaine de dramaturgie, née avec G. E. Lessing; une notion qui entre aujourd’hui à part entière, en tant qu’étude prospective préalable et/ou d’accompagnement, dans le champ pragmatique du travail théâtral, dans l’élaboration à la fois conceptuelle et concrète de la mise en scène; 3) une recension des diverses figures du dramaturge, proche collaborateur du metteur en scène et qui tisse avec lui le texte spectaculaire qui sera proposé à l’interprétation du spectateur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it