MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032012975 · doi:10.1115/esda2012-82224

New Mechanical Generators of Schoenflies Motion Implementing Bennett Linkages

2012· article· en· W2032012975 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chung-Ching Lee, Jacques M. Hervé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science CouncilMcGill University
KeywordsChain (unit)Motion (physics)Generator (circuit theory)CoaxialPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Group (periodic table)Kinematic chainRigid bodyClassical mechanicsMathematicsKinematicsCombinatoricsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsTelecommunicationsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the Bennett 4R chain, we construct a rotating loop by fixing one R axis to the frame and the fixed R becomes a coaxial double R pair. The R pair opposite to the fixed double R is replaced by a spherical S pair which can be equivalent to a (RRR) open chain with non-coplanar intersecting axes. In the (RRR) sub-chain, we choose special axes and derive R|- R|(R(RRR)R chain moving with 2 DoFs. That moving R becomes a coaxial double R with the addition of another rigid body and the obtained chain with hybrid topology generates a 3-dof motion, which is mathematically modeled by a 3D submanifold of a 4D group of X motions. Because of the product closure in an X-motion group, adding an H pair with any pitch and an axis parallel to the fixed R axis leads to a mechanical generator of a 4D X-motion group. Then, parallel arrangement of two generators of the same X motion gives a new parallel generator of X motion, which can be actuated by four fixed R pairs; the two Hs must have distinct pitches. A special design with four collinear actuated axes is revealed too.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsFrench-language works237,207