MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032020914 · doi:10.1109/isie.2013.6563598

Predictive current control and DC-link capacitor voltages balancing for four-leg NPC inverters

2013· article· en· W2032020914 on OpenAlexafffund
Venkata Yaramasu, Bin Wu, Marco Rivera, José Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)CapacitorInverterVoltageModel predictive controlComputer scienceThree-phaseReduction (mathematics)Power (physics)Nonlinear systemEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a finite control set model predictive strategy to control the three-phase four-leg neutral-point-clamped (NPC) inverters. The four-leg NPC inverter delivers power to the unbalanced/nonlinear three-phase loads, and it can produce three output currents independently. The proposed method uses the discrete-time model of the inverter and load to predict the load current and capacitor voltages behavior for each valid switching state of the inverter. The control method chooses a state which generates the minimum error between the output currents and their references and also between the capacitor voltages. The neutral-leg switching frequency reduction algorithm is also proposed to improve the efficiency of the converter. Through computer simulations, the feasibility of the proposed predictive control scheme is verified; it performs well, showing a clear capacity to compensate disturbances while balancing the DC-link capacitor voltages and reducing the average switching frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207