Synthesis, Structures, and Multinuclear NMR Spectra of Tin(II) and Lead(II) Complexes of Tellurium-Containing Imidodiphosphinate Ligands: Preparation of Two Morphologies of Phase-Pure PbTe from a Single-Source Precursor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Group 14 metal complexes of heavy chalcogen-centered anions, M[(TeP(i)Pr(2))(2)N](2) (5, M = Sn; 6, M = Pb) and M(TeP(i)Pr(2)NP(i)Pr(2)Se)(2) (7, M = Sn; 8, M = Pb), were synthesized in 64-89% yields by metathesis of alkali-metal salts of the ligands with group 14 metal dihalides. Crystallographic characterization of the complexes revealed that 5, 6, and 8 engage in metal...chalcogen secondary bonds to generate dimers, whereas 7 is monomeric in the solid state. Multinuclear ((1)H, (31)P, (77)Se, and (125)Te) solution NMR data for these homoleptic complexes evinced dynamic behavior leading to the equivalence of the two ligand environments. The Pb(II) complex 6 was utilized as a single-source precursor to micrometer-scale lead telluride particles via two divergent techniques: aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition of the complex in THF/CH(2)Cl(2) solution onto glass substrates yielded rectangular prisms, while solution injection of 6 in tri-n-octylphosphine onto Si/SiO(2)(100) substrates heated to 200-220 degrees C resulted in the formation of wires. PXRD and EDX analysis of the products confirmed the phase purity of the PbTe materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it