MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W203202853 · doi:10.1155/2010/594712

Fever and Abdominal Pain in a Returning Traveller

2010· article· en· W203202853 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Kishore, Syed Mehdi, Milan Sapundzieski, Roger Prudham, Jimmy K. Limdi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmoebic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChillsMedicineAbdominal painVomitingEmergency departmentNauseaMalaisePhysical examinationGastroenterologyInternal medicineMicrohematuriaPast medical historySurgeryProteinuriaKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Case presentationA 39-year-old man of Pakistani descent, residing in the United Kingdom, presented to the emergency department with a one-week history of fever, chills, rigors, malaise, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.He had recently returned from Pakistan, where he spent two weeks.His medical history was unremarkable, and he was not taking any regular medications.His physical examination was normal, except for a temperature of 38.5°C and slight tenderness in the right upper quadrant.He was hemodynamically stable.The patient's blood counts and electrolyte levels were normal.His liver chemistry revealed an alanine aminotransferase level of 275 U/L, an alkaline phosphatase level of 173 U/L and an albumin level of 25 g/L; his C-reactive protein level was 144 mg/L.His blood smears were negative for malaria species, and serology for acute viral hepatitis was negative.His chest radiograph was normal.The patient's stool was sent for Clostridium difficile toxin testing, and his blood, stool and urine samples were sent for culture.An urgent abdominal ultrasound scan was performed on the same day, which revealed the source of his pain.What is the diagnosis?clinical vignette

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologySame topicAmoebic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207