MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032039256 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.050316

An In Vivo Model to Study Osteogenic Gene Regulation: Targeting an Avian Retroviral Receptor (TVA) to Bone With the Bone Sialoprotein (BSP) Promoter

2005· article· en· W2032039256 on OpenAlexafffund
Ling Li, Ji Zhu, Qisheng Tu, Masato Yamauchi, Jaro Sodek, Gérard Karsenty, Jean Tang, Jake Y. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
KeywordsBone sialoproteinBiologyTransgeneMolecular biologyRUNX2In situ hybridizationGenetically modified mousePromoterGene expressionGeneEctopic expressionOsteocalcinGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: To study bone development in vivo, a transgenic mouse model was established in which an avian retroviral receptor (TVA) gene driven by the BSP promoter was selectively expressed in skeletal tissues. The model was validated by showing suppressed BSP expression and delayed bone and tooth formation after infection with a virus expressing a mutated Cbfa1/Runx2 gene. INTRODUCTION: Tissue-specific expression of the avian retroviral (TVA) receptor can be used to efficiently target ectopic expression of genes in vivo. To determine the use of this approach for studies of osteogenic differentiation and bone formation at specific developmental stages, transgenic mice expressing the TVA receptor under the control of a 5-kb bone sialoprotein (BSP) promoter were generated. The mice were first analyzed for tissue-specific expression of the TVA gene and then, after infection with a viral construct, for the effects of a dominant-negative form of the Cbfa1/Runx2 transcription factor on bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We first generated transgenic mice (BSP/TVA) in which the TVA gene was expressed under the control of a 4.9-kb mouse BSP promoter. The tissue-specific expression of the TVA gene was analyzed by RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry and compared with the expression of the endogenous BSP gene. A 396-bp fragment of mutated Cbfa1/Runx2 (Cbfa1mu) encoding the DNA-binding domain was cloned into a RCASBP (A) viral vector, which was used to infect neonatal BSP/TVA mice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Expression of the TVA receptor mRNA and protein in the transgenic mice was consistent with the expression of endogenous BSP. Four days after systemic infection with the Cbfa1mu-RCASBP (A) vector, RT-PCR analyses revealed that the expression of BSP mRNA in tibia and mandibles was virtually abolished, whereas a 30% reduction was seen in calvarial bone. After 9 days, BSP expression in the tibia and mandible was reduced by 45% in comparison with control animals infected with an empty RCASBP vector, whereas BSP expression in the membranous bone of calvariae was decreased approximately 15%. However, after 4 and 8 weeks, there was almost no change in BSP expression in any of the bone tissues. In comparison, a reduction in osteopontin expression was only observed 9 days after viral transfection in the three bones. Histomorphological examination revealed that bone formation and tooth development were delayed in some of the mice infected with mutated Cbfa1. These studies show that BSP/TVA transgenic mice can be used to target genes to sites of osteogenesis, providing a unique system for studying molecular events associated with bone formation in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207