MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032056893 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0600

Distributed output regulation of switching multi‐agent systems subject to input saturation

2013· article· en· W2032056893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Saturation (graph theory)Computer scienceMulti-agent systemControl engineeringSubject (documents)Control (management)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we consider the distributed output regulation (DOR) problem of linear multi‐agent systems subject to input saturation with switching topology. Owing to the input saturation elements, the considered systems is non‐linear. It is natural to take the semiglobal frame for it which allows one to use distributed linear feedback controller. The basic problem is to design distributed feedback controller for the considered multi‐agent systems in order to have all agents to track an active leader and/or distributed rejection with disturbance signals. Both the leader and the disturbance signal are modelled as the exogenous system with different dynamics and unmeasurable variables. A systematic distributed linear design approach based on the solvability condition is proposed for the considered DOR problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it