MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032072336 · doi:10.1159/000100901

Treatment of Delusions in Dementia with Lewy Bodies – Response to Pharmacotherapy

2007· review· en· W2032072336 on OpenAlexaff
Corinne E. Fischer, Radenka Bozanovic, Jana H. Atkins, Sean B. Rourke

Bibliographic record

VenueDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsOntario HIV Treatment NetworkUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementia with Lewy bodiesRivastigmineDementiaDelusionPsychologyPharmacotherapyPsychiatryMedicineRandomized controlled trialDonepezilInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Delusions are clinically important symptoms in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The purpose of this review is to examine the level of evidence for treatment of delusions in DLB. METHODS: To achieve this objective Medline was searched. Studies were included in the review if they were prospective, separated delusions from hallucinations and were tested in patients with DLB. RESULTS: The review yielded a total of six studies. Although all studies showed effectiveness, only one study using rivastigmine had an adequate patient sample size and used a randomized controlled design. CONCLUSION: Further studies are required before a definitive conclusion can be reached about effective treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDementia and Geriatric Cognitive DisordersSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207