MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032072564 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2011.31.709

An example of rapid evolution of complex limit cycles

2011· preprint· en· W2032072564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolomorphic functionLimit cycleMathematicsMultiplicity (mathematics)Complex planePerturbation (astronomy)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsLimit (mathematics)PhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the current article we study complex cycles of highermultiplicity in a specific polynomial family of holomorphicfoliations in the complex plane. The family in question is aperturbation of an exact polynomial one-form giving rise to afoliation by Riemann surfaces. In this setting, a complex cycle isdefined as a nontrivial element of the fundamental group of a leaffrom the foliation. In addition to that, we introduce the notionof a multi-fold cycle and show that in our example there exists alimit cycle of any multiplicity. Furthermore, such a cycle givesrise to a one-parameter family of cycles continuously depending onthe perturbation parameter. As the parameter decreases in absolutevalue, the cycles from the continuous family escape from a verylarge subdomain of the complex plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it