Proctolin: A possible releasing factor in the corpus cardiacum/corpus allatum of the locust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The corpus cardiacum (CC) and corpus allatum (CA) of the locust, Locusta migratoria, contain intense proctolin-like immunoreactivity (PLI) within processes and varicosities. In contrast, in the cockroach, Diploptera punctata, although a similar staining pattern occurs within the CC, PLI appears absent within the CA. The possible role of proctolin as a releasing factor for adipokinetic hormone (AKH) and juvenile hormone (JH) was investigated in the locust. Proctolin caused a dose-dependent increase in AKH I release (determined by RP-HPLC) from the locust CC over a range of doses with threshold above 10(-8)M and maximal release at about 10(-7)M proctolin. Isolated glandular lobes of the CC released greater amounts of AKH I following treatment with proctolin and in these studies AKH II was also released. Confirmation of AKH I release was obtained by injecting perfusate from incubated CCs into locusts and measuring hemolymph lipid concentration. Perfusate from CC incubated in proctolin contained material with similar biological activity to AKH. Proctolin was also found to significantly increase the synthesis and release of JH from locust CA, with the increase being greatest from CAs that had a relatively low basal rate of JH biosynthesis (<35 pmol h(-1) per CA). In contrast, proctolin did not alter the synthesis and release of JH from the cockroach CA. These results suggest that proctolin may act as a releasing factor for AKHs and JH in the locust but does not act as a releasing factor for JH in the cockroach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".