MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PROFESSOR ROSSITER H. CROZIER 1943-2009

2009· article· en· W2032097491 on OpenAlexaffabout
Graham Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolution · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photo: Alex Wild Ross H. Crozier died 12 November while working from his laboratory at James Cook University in Townsville, Australia, after suffering a heart attack. He was 66. Professor Crozier was a major contributor to our understanding, both empirical and theoretical, of the evolutionary genetics of social breeding systems, particularly those of social insects. He was an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow, a member of the Australian Academy, and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2006, he received the inaugural Hamilton Award from the International Union for the Study of Social Insects in recognition of outstanding achievements in the area of social insect research. It is fitting that Ross would have won this award because he so well exposed the significance of William D. Hamilton's theory of kin selection and its associated concept of inclusive fitness—even correcting some of Hamilton's key calculations from his seminal 1964 papers. A proponent of selfish gene thinking throughout his career, and ever the enthusiast for the molecular approach, Crozier bridged the gap between kin theory and empirical genetics like none before him, and his pioneering efforts paved the way toward the now burgeoning field of sociogenomics. Ross was born in India during World War II, and spent parts of his youth living abroad. But by age 9, he was enrolled as a boarder at Geelong Grammar in his native Australia. After pondering a career in journalism, Ross began a zoology major at nearby Melbourne University. There, he met Malaysian science student Yuen Ching Kok, his future wife and research partner of more than 40 years. Together, they would move to the United States, and in 1969 Ross would earn his Ph.D. from Cornell University. Soon after, Ross began as assistant professor at the University of Georgia, and in 1975 repatriated to begin a 15-year career at the University of New South Wales in Sydney. Crozier began in ant cytogenetics, but soon took a leading role in the theoretical and empirical study of relatedness: he advocated its utility in evolutionary studies as a measure of reproductive worth, and was the first to derive the correct pedigree-based estimates of relatedness for male-haploidy and X-linked genes. His insight was significant for it enabled the empirical genetic study of Hymenopteran societies (ants, bees and wasps), around which Hamilton's theory was rapidly developing. He would later help formulate more widely applicable, statistical estimators of relatedness that proved a major advance for studying genetic structure of whole populations, social or otherwise; an approach that opened a new field highlighting the presence and significance of such structure using molecular markers such as mtDNA and microsatellites. From his base Down Under, Ross’s reputation as an international leader in the fields of molecular biology and social behavior began to grow. In 1990, Crozier moved to LaTrobe University in Melbourne as professor of genetics and head of department. Despite this extra responsibility, Ross remained ever involved in the day to day activities of his large and diversified research group, which, in 2000, he relocated to James Cook, in tropical Australia. There, Ross was appointed professor of evolutionary genetics and awarded a personal chair. Over the years, Ross and Ching's laboratory gained renown for its nurturing and intellectually rich atmosphere. They attracted students, research fellows, and visiting faculty from all corners of Australia, as well as from the U.S., Denmark, China, France, Switzerland, Canada, U.K., Finland, Japan, Indonesia, Germany, and beyond. Ross welcomed all into his laboratory and into his life. Many will have experienced Ross’s generosity and his liking for people at Christmas dinners that he and Ching held, to which lonesome students and academics a long way from home were invited, as well as family members. Ross was never more comfortable than when surrounded by his students, postdocs, and colleagues, talking research or politics, and sharing anecdotes from the field or from the laboratory. Many will remember the weekly laboratory meetings, which Ross held in his office—buttressed, as it was, with books floor to ceiling, overflowing with stacks of journals, and, on these occasions, stocked with wine and cheese. Ever supportive of his students, but not one to give away too much, Ross had a knack for subtle comment; either, just enough to embolden a student with confidence or encourage them to rethink their stance. Ross was a great mentor. He spoke softly, but when he did, people listened. Though always an ant-man, Ross’s work would come to embrace the entire social spectrum, from termites to bees to birds, and much else besides. In 1993, Ross and Ching published the complete sequence of the honey bee mitochondrial genome. Recognized as “a milestone in molecular entomology” (MA Hoy. 1995. Insect Molecular Genetics), it represented the first complete insect sequence outside of the flies. Their accomplishment is all the more impressive when one considers such an undertaking was a decade ahead of expectation for even a busy molecular ecology laboratory. Its painstaking assembly showed that mitochondrial gene order changes could be extensive, and highlighted how directional mutation pressure can yield problems in phylogeny reconstruction. Moreover, it showed something of Ross’s own character—a careful, consistent man of high intellect, driven by dogged determination. Ever humble, he once joked that he should not have been listed as an author on this “Crozier and Crozier” classic (1993. Genetics 133: 97–117). But, with a wink, he quips how he “Gave into Ching's insistence.” Ross’s success was not based on a single achievement, discovery, paper, or even topic. Rather, it was his style to chip away at dozens of questions he found interesting. He was at the forefront of genetic studies on caste determination, wrote authoritatively on the evolution of reproductive altruism, and once codiscovered an ant with the lowest possible number of chromosomes (1!). A careful writer, he clarified how selection should act on kin recognition and sex-determining loci, and showed how the evolution and expression of immune genes is affected by group living. He was a vocal proponent for statistical approaches to phylogenetic tree reconstruction, and applied phylogeny to many questions of social evolution and conservation biology. Throughout his career, Crozier revisited certain curiosities, including the question of multiple mating in social insects—a paradoxical situation that significantly reduces intracolonial relatedness, and therefore promotes conflict over cooperation. As exemplified here, it was Crozier's way to first develop the ideas that potentially resolved outstanding questions, then return to test them as analytical or DNA technologies advanced sufficiently to yield new insights. This style of addressing thought-provoking questions with new ideas and new tools made the “Crozier Lab” fertile training ground for many aspiring biologists. To them—to many—Ross not only studied social insects, he validated them as model systems in the study of how natural selection works. In 1996, he published, with Pekka Pamilo, an exposition of this ability in Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin-Selection (Oxford University Press). Although Ross’s entire career was spent on the front lines of science, he was as active behind them, upholding a vast tapestry of personal correspondence. To ask Ross a question over e-mail was surely to prompt a fast and informative response, if not two or three as he strived to be as helpful as possible. This made him naturally effective to the many societies that he served, including a former role as vice President for the Society for the Study of Evolution, and associate editor for Evolution. It is sobering to think that Ross is gone, but his memory and influence will live on through the many students and colleagues that he taught, coached, and befriended. Ross went at the height of his powers, doing what he did so well, with Ching by his side. He will be sadly missed for his enthusiasm, profound knowledge, and gentle mentorship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207