Effects of Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Advanced Experimental Polycystic Kidney Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several dietary interventions, including those involving conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), slow progression of polycystic kidney disease (PKD) when initiated in the early stages of disease in Han:SPRD-cy rats. However, in humans, kidney disease is often undetected until extensive renal injury has developed. The objective of this study therefore was to determine whether initiating dietary CLA intervention in advanced PKD would slow disease progression. METHODS: Adult male Han:SPRD-cy rats with advanced kidney disease were fed diets with or without 1% CLA for 16 weeks. Disease progression was assessed by serum urea, proteinuria, and creatinine clearance, and morphological and immunohistochemical measurements for pathologic change. RESULTS: Renal injury was lower in the PKD rats given CLA compared to those given the control diet as indicated by a reduction in inflammation (42% less), fibrosis (28% less), oxidative damage (30% less) and proliferating cells (35% less). Diet had no effect on body, kidney, or liver weight, serum urea, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, or cyst volume. CONCLUSIONS: Late dietary intervention with CLA reduced some disease-associated pathologies, but did not alter renal function in adult Han:SPRD-cy rats. The long-term anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiproliferative benefits of CLA in advanced kidney disease remain to be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it