MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032125763 · doi:10.1086/318682

Molecular Gas and the Modest Star Formation Efficiency in the “Antennae” Galaxies: Arp 244 = NGC 4038/9

2001· article· en· W2032125763 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStar formationMolecular cloudStarsFlux (metallurgy)H II regionStellar massInterstellar medium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(abridged) We report here a factor of 5.7 higher total CO flux in Arp~244 (the ``Antennae'' galaxies) than that previously accepted in the literature (thus a total molecular gas mass of 1.5x10$^{10}$ Msun), based on our fully sampled CO(1-0) observations at the NRAO 12m telescope. Our observations show that the molecular gas peaks predominately in the disk-disk overlap region between the nuclei, similar to the far-infrared (FIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) emission. The bulk of the molecular gas is forming into stars with a normal star formation efficiency (SFE) L_{IR}/M(H_2) \approx 4.2 Lsun/Msun, same as that of giant molecular clouds in the Galactic disk. Additional supportive evidence is the extremely low fraction of the dense molecular gas in Arp~244, revealed by our detections of the HCN(1-0) emission. We estimate the local SFE indicated by the ratio map of the radio continuum to CO(1-0) emission. Remarkably, the local SFE stays roughly same over the bulk of the molecular gas distribution. Only some localized regions show the highest radio-to-CO ratios that we have identified as the sites of the most intense starbursts with SFE >~ 20 Lsun/Msun. These starburst regions are confined exclusively in the dusty patches seen in the HST images near the CO and FIR peaks where presumably the violent starbursts are heavily obscured. Nevertheless, recent large-scale star formation is going on throughout the system, yet the measured level is more suggestive of a moderate starburst (SFE >~ 10 Lsun/Msun) or a weak to normal star formation (SFE ~ 4 Lsun/Msun). The overall starburst from the bulk of the molecular gas is yet to be initiated as most of the gas further condenses into kpc scale in the final coalescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207